![]() “It is the last of which which I embrace for my own part with a full and ever strengthening conviction of its truth.” Horae, Vol. John’s time to the consummation: – a Scheme which, in regard of its particular application of the symbols of Babylon and the Beast to Papal Rome and Popedom, was early embraced, as we saw, by the Waldenses, Wickliffites, and Hussites then adopted with fuller light by the chief reformers, German, Swiss, French and English, of the 16th century and transmitted downwards uninterruptedly, even to the present time. “The 3rd is what we may call emphatically the Protestant continuous Historic Scheme of Interpretation that which regards the Apocalypse as a prefiguration in detail of the chief events affecting the Church and Christendom, whether secular or ecclesiastical, from St. Burgh, the Oxford Tractator on Antichrist, and others, in our own times and era, not without considerable success … ![]() the things concerning Christ’s second Advent: a Scheme first set forth, we saw, by the Jesuit Ribera, at the end of the 16th century and which in its main principle has been urged alike by Dr. “The 2nd is the Futurist Scheme making the whole of the Apocalyptic Prophecy, (excepting perhaps the primary Vision and Letters to the Seven Churches,) to relate to things now future, viz. “For, in conclusion, the readers of this Historic Sketch will see that there are but three grand Schemes of Apocalyptic Interpretation that can be considered as standing up face to face against each other… The 1st is that of the Praeterists respecting the subject of prophecy, except in its two or three last chapters, to the catastrophes of the Jewish nation and old Roman Empire … which Scheme, originally propounded, as we saw, by the Jesuit Alcasar, and then adopted by Grotius … by Professor Moses Stuart in the United States of America, and by disciples in the German School in England … As a result of his vast research and tremendous historical perspective, Elliott clearly reveals the three major contending schools of prophetic interpretation. Volume 4 contains a well-written, thorough, and extremely valuable overview of every major Apocalyptic commentator in the history of Christianity – from the days of John to the mid 1800’s – called History of Apocalyptic Interpretation. The great Baptist preacher Charles Spurgeon, in his Comments on the Commentaries, considered Elliott’s work “the standard.” In 1862, the 5th edition of his classic four-volume Horae Apocalypticae – A Commentary on the Apocalypse, was published in London. One of the most well-respected Bible Commentators in the history of Christianity was England’s well-beloved, E.B. This Prophetic Perspectives series will simplify and clarify the issues. Each of these schools view the prophecies of Daniel and Revelation differently. Many Christians don’t know this, but there are really three major “prophetic schools” of interpretation now in conflict – Preterism, Historicism, and Futurism.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |